ReviewPhysics of life reviews2026
Beyond networks: Toward adaptive models of biological complexity.
Review in Physics of life reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundational issues of network models in biology.Biological cybernetics · 2026Review
- One Earth + One Health: An Agile, Evolutionary, System-of-Systems Convergence Paradigm.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- The intrinsic reason why the term "central sensitization" should be refined, by introducing the terms "spinal sensitization", "pain-related brain network sensitization", and "psychosocial-related sensitization".Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Systemic neuropsychology: toward a contemporary theory of topological functional systems.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Network science models have transformed our understanding of complex systems across biology, technology, and society, proving valuable in neuroscience. However, modeling biological complexity poses specific challenges, calling for expansions of traditional network frameworks. This paper explores constructive ways to enhance models, highlighting opportunities such as incorporating time-varying connections, adaptive topologies, and multilayer structures to better represent the temporal dynamics and multilevel interactions characteristic of biological systems. Additionally, it addresses deeper conceptual challenges, notably the substantial context dependence, open-endedness, and history sensitivity often observed in biology. By reviewing concepts such as Kauffman's "adjacent possible," the discussion emphasizes how biological state spaces themselves may dynamically evolve, suggesting the need for modeling strategies beyond static or pre-specified assumptions. Rather than undermining network science, these considerations highlight areas where traditional formalisms can fruitfully adapt and grow, ultimately deepening their explanatory power. The paper advocates integrating data-driven approaches that dynamically infer system properties from empirical observations, balancing modeling generality with biological specificity. Overall, this synthesis provides an assessment of both the strengths of network science and the challenges it faces, proposing constructive avenues for methodological and conceptual innovation that advance our ability to capture the nuanced complexity inherent in biological phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.