ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2026
A descriptive study of drug overdose epidemics, overdose prevention efforts, and opioid settlement fund distribution across six states.
Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince 1999, drug overdose deaths have surged in the United States. There is considerable geographic variability in overdose patterns, state laws, overdose prevention infrastructure, and opioid settlement amounts and investments. To guide localized overdose prevention, it is important to analyze these data and understand heterogeneity.
methodsIn this descriptive analysis across six states-Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New York, and Rhode Island, we compared five key domains essential to understanding overdose epidemics, prevention, and policy responses: (1) drug overdose mortality trends by substance and race/ethnicity (2018-2023); (2) state harm reduction laws; (3) availability and coverage of overdose prevention services; (4) opioid settlement funding and spending; and (5) availability and comprehensiveness of publicly available overdose-related data. Data were drawn from publicly available sources and legal information confirmed using Westlaw.
resultsAll states experienced rising overdose death rates between 2018 and 2023, with significant racial/ethnic disparities. All states have enacted laws to increase access to naloxone. Naloxone distribution rates vary widely, but most states have high availability. Implementation of other harm reduction services differed across states, as well as drug paraphernalia laws. Opioid settlement funding per capita and transparency in spending and planning also differed across states. Some dashboards provided detailed fatal and nonfatal overdose and intervention data stratified by sociodemographics.
conclusionState-specific differences in overdose patterns, harm reduction laws, prevention infrastructure, and settlement spending underscore the need for localized, tailored strategies. This study's state-specific profiles lay the groundwork for more advanced decision-support tools to guide effective overdose prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.