ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2025
A machine learning model for predicting oligoclonal band positivity using routine cerebrospinal fluid and serum biochemical markers.
Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting oligoclonal band (OCB) positivity using routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum biochemical markers to improve the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of assessing intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis.
methodsIn this retrospective study (n = 1709), an ensemble model was developed using 8 refined CSF and serum parameters. Combining optimized CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM classifiers, the model was trained and evaluated using a 2-phase workflow, including 5-fold cross-validation and validation on independent internal (n = 342) and external (n = 49) cohorts.
resultsThe developed ensemble model achieved a receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.902 on the internal test set, significantly outperforming the conventional IgG index (ROC-AUC, 0.795). At its optimal threshold, the model demonstrated an accuracy of 0.830, with a sensitivity of 0.714 and a specificity of 0.916. On the external validation cohort, it achieved 90% accuracy and 96% sensitivity.
conclusionsA novel machine learning ensemble model accurately predicts OCB positivity using routine laboratory data and demonstrates superior performance compared with the IgG index. This approach represents a significant step in applying artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine, with the potential to enhance diagnostic efficiency. Prospective, multicenter validation is essential for broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.