Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351832›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

HaploVar: An R package for defining local haplotype variants for trait association and trait prediction analyses.

Tessa R MacNish, Hawlader A Al-Mamun, Thomas Bergmann, Mitchell S Bestry, Jacob I Marsh, David Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tessa R MacNishSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Hawlader A Al-MamunSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Thomas BergmannSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Mitchell S BestrySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Jacob I MarshDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryMarker assisted breeding (MAB) supports breeding by identifying individuals or molecular markers associated with important traits. MAB methods include genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic selection (GS). Local haplotypes are regions of DNA that are inherited together due to high levels of linkage disequilibrium. Local haplotypes can improve the prediction accuracy and power of GS and GWAS. Currently available local haplotyping tools improve GWAS power through fine-mapping of candidate regions or through haplotype-based GWAS. However, no local haplotyping tools utilize the benefits of haplotypes for GS. Here we present HaploVar, a local haplotyping tool designed to improve both GWAS and GS pipelines by identifying local haplotypes and formatting the output to be compatible with all major GWAS and GS tools. HaploVar can be used in any haplotype-based MAB study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HaploVar can be downloaded from CRAN with R > 4.0.0 (DOI: 10.32614/CRAN.package.HaploVar). HaploVar and a tutorial vignette is available on GitHub (https://github.com/TessaMacNish/HaploVar). HaploVar is available under an MIT license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available at Bioinformatics online.

Identifiers

PMID41351832
PMCPMC12684708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.