Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351821›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of hypertension2026

The Role of Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension in Canada: A Case-Based Discussion from the Canadian Hypertension Specialists Society.

Raj S Padwal, Michael Dorsch, Sheldon Tobe, Jennifer Ringrose, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Ross D Feldman, Bhanu Prasad, Alexander A Leung, Lisa Dubrofsky, Karen C Tran and 3 more

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Raj S PadwalDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2817
Michael DorschDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Sheldon TobeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer RingroseDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ernesto L SchiffrinHypertension and Vascular Research Unit, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-2823
Ross D FeldmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Bhanu PrasadSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Regina General Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK, Canada.
Alexander A LeungDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lisa DubrofskyDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen C TranDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mina MadanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lindsay MachanDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nadia KhanDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over one-third of Canadians with hypertension do not achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets despite availability of effective treatments. Renal sympathetic nerve denervation (RDN) is a recently approved, minimally invasive treatment for hypertension being offered in multiple Canadian centers. How best to implement this procedure in contemporary Canadian clinical practice remains unclear. Herein, we provide a Canadian hypertension specialist viewpoint on use of RDN in Canada. We review the rationale for, and evidence supporting, the use of RDN and discuss, using 2 clinical cases, its potential therapeutic role. We note that RDN has effectively lowered BP in multiple, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trials and has a favorable safety profile. Economic models indicate that it is cost-effective in the Canadian context. Conversely, the BP-lowering effect is relatively modest; no well-established method to pre-identify responders exists; cardiovascular endpoint data supporting use of RDN are lacking; and no clear funding model is currently in place in Canada. Accordingly, we suggest that use of RDN be reserved for willing patients with severely elevated BP despite the use of first-line conventional therapies who have had secondary causes excluded. Examples include patients with resistant hypertension or moderate or severe hypertension and multiple drug intolerance syndrome. In view of its recent approval and known operator-dependency, RDN should be offered solely through programmatic, multidisciplinary collaboration between hypertension specialists and experienced interventionalists using a shared decision-making approach with the patient. Funding deployment should target such programs and sites should carefully monitor their outcomes to confirm comparability to the published literature.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertensionKidneySympathectomyAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurecase reportrenal denervationresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41351821
PMCPMC13189695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.