ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Use of a Novel Tele-Assessment Tool for the Identification of Autism in Preschool-Aged Children.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis work evaluates use of the TELE-ASD-PEDS-Preschool (TAP-P), a telemedicine-based autism assessment tool for the preschool age range. The TAP-P is a play-based instrument with varied administration and scoring procedures based on a child's language level. This study compared tele-assessment using the TAP-P to in-person autism assessment.
methodsParticipants were 116 children (aged 36-71 months) referred for autism evaluation. Participants first completed in-home tele-assessment (administration of the TAP-P, clinical interview, and Developmental Profile 4). All participants then completed in-person assessment with a different psychological provider, including cognitive or developmental assessment, adaptive behavior assessment, and autism-focused assessment (ADOS-2). Caregivers completed questionnaires after each appointment assessing their perceptions.
resultsWhen asked to make a binary decision about presence or absence of autism, tele-assessment and in-person clinicians agreed for 82% of participants (n = 95). In most instances of diagnostic disagreement (n = 17), tele-assessment clinicians indicated the absence of autism and in-person clinicians indicated the presence of autism. When given the option to select "unsure," tele-assessment clinicians reported uncertainty for 28% of participants assessed using Form 1 of the TAP-P (designed for children with less verbal language, defined as two-word phrases or less) and 52% of children assessed using Form 2 (for children with more verbal language). Families reported broad satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures.
conclusionThis work highlights potential utility of tele-assessment for identification of autism in preschool-aged children with less verbal language, while emphasizing the critical need for additional research related to use of tele-assessment for children using more complex and flexible verbal language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.