Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351771›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2025

Tobacco deprivation impairs metacognitive accuracy and cognitive flexibility.

Alexander Soutschek, Tina Engelmann, Rebekka S Mattes, Charlotte E Wittekind

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander SoutschekChair of Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany. alexander.soutschek@psy.lmu.de.
Tina EngelmannChair of Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Rebekka S MattesChair of Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Charlotte E WittekindChair of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTobacco dependence is characterized by a high relapse rate. It is thus important to obtain a better understanding of the cognitive precipitants of smoking relapses, and how these are changed under tobacco deprivation. Here, we provide evidence that tobacco deprivation impairs two cognitive processes important for successful smoking cessation: metacognition and cognitive flexibility.

methodsIn a pre-registered study following a within-subject design, persons who regularly smoke performed behavioral tasks measuring metacognition, motivation for mental effort, cognitive flexibility, and smoking lapses either in saturated or deprived states.

resultsWe found that tobacco deprivation not only increased the preference for immediate rewards but also impaired metacognitive knowledge about these preferences; strikingly, these metacognitive skills were moreover related to individual lapse behavior. While there was no evidence for deprivation effects on mental effort, tobacco deprivation also impaired the ability to overcome dysfunctional cue-reward associations, indicating deficits in cognitive flexibility.

conclusionsTaken together, the current findings deepen our understanding of how tobacco deprivation alters cognitive processes contributing to addictive behaviors in tobacco dependence, which may lead to improved interventions for smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Delay discountingMental effortMetacognitionNicotineReversal learningRewardValue-modulated attentional capture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.