ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Cardioprotective effects of Sodium-Glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation: a propensity-matched cohort study.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Drug safety · 2026Pooled it
- Immortal time bias in a study of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in ventricular tachycardia ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have proven to be beneficial in improving cardiovascular outcomes and reducing all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM. We aimed to investigate the effect SGLT2i use on cardiovascular outcomes inpatients with T2DM who underwent VT ablation.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a federated network of healthcare organizations across the United States. Adults (aged 18-80 years) with T2DM who underwent catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia were included. Patients were stratified based on exposure to SGLT2i. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed within 3 years following the index ablation procedure. Patients with a recorded occurrence of the outcome prior to the index event were excluded from each respective outcome analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsSGLT2 inhibitor non-users exhibited significantly higher hazard ratios (HR) for various adverse outcomes. The HR for all-cause mortality was 1.422 (95% CI: 1.279-1.581), while the HR for cardiac arrest was 1.409 (95% CI: 1.135-1.750). Additionally, the HR for post-ablation cardioversion was 1.188 (95% CI: 1.042-1.355), and the utilization of amiodarone after ablation had an HR of 1.240 (95% CI: 1.106-1.391). In contrast, the hazard ratios for redo ablation (1.039, 95% CI: 0.956-1.128), visits for ICD adjustments (0.916, 95% CI: 0.766-1.096), post-ablation use of any class of antiarrhythmics (1.139, 95% CI: 0.906-1.431), and lidocaine (0.911, 95% CI: 0.775-1.070) were less definitive.
conclusionSGLT2i non-user group was associated with significantly higher risks of several adverse outcomes following ablation, including a 42% increase in all-cause mortality and a 41% increase in cardiac arrest. Non-users also had higher rates of post-ablation cardioversion and amiodarone use. However, no significant differences were found in redo ablation, ICD adjustments, or the use of other antiarrhythmics. These findings suggest a potential protective role of SGLT2 inhibitors in selective cardiovascular outcomes. Further studies are warranted to confirm these associations and investigate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.