ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
The effect of robot-assisted surgery on the gynecology patients' experience and quality of life after surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted gynecological surgery enhances precision, shortens recovery time, and reduces postoperative complications. However, its impact on patient-reported outcomes and their quality of life remains underexplored. This study evaluates the patient's quality of life following robot-assisted gynecological surgeries, focusing on physical function, pain, vitality, and sexual health. A prospective non-randomized study was conducted, assessing quality of life using validated tools before and at multiple intervals post-surgery using the RAND-36 survey, the Brief Pain Index and the Female Sexual Function Index. Subgroups included patients undergoing robot-assisted hysterectomy, myomectomy, cystectomy or both myomectomy and cystectomy. Significant improvements in quality of life were observed as early as 3 weeks post-surgery, with continued gains at 12 and 24 weeks, where maximum quality of life was achieved. Pain scores decreased from baseline to week 3 and remained consistently low thereafter. Vitality scores returned to baseline within 3 weeks, indicating a faster recovery compared to laparoscopic and traditional open surgeries. Sexual health outcomes initially declined post-surgery but gradually improved over six months. These findings suggest that robot-assisted gynecological surgery enhances long-term quality of life and offers a quicker recovery compared to conventional surgical approaches. However, the non-randomized study design limits the generalizability of the results, underscoring the need for randomized controlled trials to validate these outcomes and further refine patient care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.