ReviewJournal of fluorescence2026
Naked Eye Meets Nucleic Acids: A Review on Dyes for Isothermal Amplification Methods for Detection of Meat Adulteration.
Review in Journal of fluorescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Speed and Sensitivity to Robust Reliability: Addressing the Detection Bias of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) in Food Authentication.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meat adulteration poses significant challenges to public health and consumer trust, necessitating the development of effective detection methods. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification (NAA) techniques, such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), have emerged as rapid and cost-effective alternatives to conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These techniques simplify infrastructure requirements and can enable naked-eye detection (NED) through visible color changes with specific dyes. This study highlights the potential and suitability of various dyes for the NED of IA-based meat adulteration detection. Intercalating dyes, such as SYBR Green I, bind to the amplified DNA and emit fluorescence. pH-sensitive dyes, including phenol red, neutral red, and xylenol orange, change color with pH shifts during amplification. Triphenylmethane dyes, such as crystal violet and malachite green, directly interact with DNA, showing no pH dependence. Intercalating dyes, such as SYBR Green I, achieve superior sensitivity, often reaching 10 fg of target DNA. Conversely, other dyes like Hydroxynaphthol blue and other pH-sensitive and pH-independent dyes provide slightly lesser sensitivity, typically ranging from 100 fg to 1 pg. Dye-based NED combined with IA offers advantages such as rapid results, high sensitivity and specificity, suitability for field testing, and potential integration into lab-on-chip systems. However, further research is required to optimize dye formulations, develop multiplex assays, enhance sample preparation for complex food matrices, and investigate novel isothermal methods and primer designs. Accurate standardization and validation of these techniques are crucial for their widespread adoption to ensure food safety and consumer trust in the meat industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.