ArticleJournal of fluorescence2026
Triazole-Schiff Base Hybrids as Potential Dual Inhibitors of Bcl-2 and EGFR: Synthesis, Characterization, and Computational Insights.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Triazole-Schiff Base Hybrids as Potential Dual Inhibitors of Bcl-2 and EGFR: Synthesis, Characterization, and Computational Insights.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a major global health challenge, requiring the development of novel therapeutic agents with high efficacy and minimal side effects. In this study, we designed and synthesised a series of hybrid molecules incorporating triazoles, Schiff bases and substituted aromatic motifs, targeting the key oncogenic proteins Bcl-2 and EGFR. The compounds were characterised using spectroscopic techniques and their physicochemical and computational insights were assessed using in silico tools. ADMET showed poor toxicity, Molecular docking studies revealed high binding affinities for both Bcl-2 (docking energies: -6.9 to -7.1 kcal/mol) and EGFR (-9.6 to -10.0 kcal/mol), with compound 5d showing the highest affinity. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of the protein-ligand complexes over 200 ns, with RMSD, RMSF, Rg and SASA analyses confirming favourable binding interactions. The compounds showed excellent similarity to drugs, high gastrointestinal absorption and low risk of toxicity. These results suggest that the synthesised hybrids hold great promise as as potential dual-targeted anti-cancer agents warranting further experimental investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.