ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Microbial Communities Display Key Functional Differences between Reference and Restored Salt Marshes.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Viral lysis and host reprogramming impact carbohydrate, amino acid, and osmolyte cycling in salt-marsh tidal creek sediments.ISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salt marshes, despite their ecological importance (i.e., carbon sequestration) and rapid decline due to climate change and sea-level rise. Salt marsh ecosystems provide essential services such as removal of pollutants, carbon sequestration, and protection of coastal lands from storm surges. These services are strongly influenced by plant productivity, which is closely linked to microbial processes such as biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. To retain carbon sequestration and other ecological functions, substantial efforts are currently directed towards coastal marsh restoration. Restoration efforts often lack comprehensive assessments of ecosystem functioning. Here, in an effort to assess ecosystem functions, we compared the microbial and viral community composition, as well as the genetic potential between reference and 10-year-old restored marshes in Galveston Bay, TX, USA. Duplicate bulk surface sediment in stands of Spartina alterniflora were sampled for metagenomic analysis. Metagenome assembled genomes analysis showed that while the microbial community composition was largely similar among sites, the overall metabolic potential was dissimilar. Restored sites displayed a higher abundance of carbon and nitrogen cycling functions compared to reference sites, which mainly consisted of sulfur cycling. Although the restored sites developed sediment microbial communities that approached reference microbial composition, the differences in the metabolic functions suggest that even after 10 years, the restored sites were still in a transitional stage of development. The differences between the reference and restored sites were even more differentiated in the viral community's predicted host composition. Additionally, viruses potentially play a variety of roles within the sediment community, including population control and biogeochemical cycles participation through auxiliary metabolic genes. These results highlight the prolonged timeline of functional development in restored salt marshes and highlight the need to develop approaches to boost the development of soil microbial communities in newly created habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.