ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
In silico evaluation of anticancer peptide as a novel therapeutic agent against AURKA for targeting oral carcinogenesis.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a malignant epithelial neoplasm that affects the head and neck region and contributes to around 84-97% of oral cancer. Aurora kinase A is a key regulator of cell cycle progression and mitotic spindle assembly, which plays a critical role in the development and progression of OSCC. Knockdown of AURKA suppresses cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while inducing apoptosis and reactive oxygen species generation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. This highlights the functional significance of AURKA in tumor progression and supports its potential as a novel therapeutic target. This study focuses on the in silico evaluation of anticancer peptides (ACPs) as potential inhibitors of AURKA, aiming to identify novel peptide-based drugs for targeting oral cancer.
methodsUsing advanced computational techniques, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and pharmacokinetics profiling, we have screened 116 ACPs to evaluate their binding affinity, structural stability, and effect of mutagenesis. Interestingly, it was observed that AIP19 peptide demonstrated high binding affinity of -1049.8 and exhibited strong binding affinity to the catalytic pocket of AURKA, forming key hydrophobic interactions with residues such as Leu139, Phe144, Val147, Leu210, and Trp277, along with hydrogen bonds involving Lys143, Pro214, and Glu260. These interactions highlight its potential as a promising peptide-based inhibitor. Using the in silico mutagenesis approach, several peptide variants of AIP19 were generated to study the impact of specific mutations on the binding affinity. The results indicated that AIP19 mutations, including F5W, V6Y, V9W and M11Y could potentially enhance the peptide's binding affinity for AURKA. Furthermore, the drug likeness properties, low toxicity, and better biocompatibility of peptides highlight their potential as cancer-targeted therapeutics with minimal adverse effect. The stability and binding affinity of the AURKA-peptide complexes were evaluated using molecular dynamic simulation and MM GB/PBSA analysis. This study highlights the effectiveness of in silico methodologies in accelerating the discovery and optimization of peptide-based drugs. The identified ACPs represent a promising step toward the development of safe and effective therapeutics against OSCC, offering a novel approach to combat tumor progression that leverages structure-based peptide engineering to enhance binding affinity. This study lays the groundwork for future experimental validation of AIP19, highlighting its promise as a targeted therapeutic strategy for OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.