ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2026
Developing a Logic Model Framework for Community-Dwelling, Non-Familial Intergenerational Programmes.
Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-dwelling, non-familial intergenerational programmes (IPs) have emerged as a promising approach to preventing social isolation and loneliness among older adults. However, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the key components, underlying mechanisms, and contextual factors involved in implementing such programmes. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive logic model framework for non-familial IPs to guide future programme design and implementation. A qualitative approach was employed to analyse the 'Post für Dich!' [Mail for You] programme in rural Lower Austria through semi-structured interviews with older adults, implementation agents, and community leaders, along with a focus group of primary school children, and a document analysis. The resulting logic model framework identifies critical inputs (e.g., local coordinator, engaged implementation agents, meeting spaces, programme flexibility), highlights the role of existing organisational settings in facilitating access to target groups, and outlines key activities (programme initiation, coordination, letter exchanges, and intergenerational events). It reports multifaceted benefits for participants, such as improved attitudes, dispelled age stereotypes, expanded social networks, and an enriched daily life for older adults. Potential community-level impacts, such as fostering multigenerational awareness and integration, are noted. This empirically grounded framework serves as a practical tool for systematically designing, implementing, and evaluating IPs across diverse settings. It can facilitate knowledge transfer, evidence-informed practice, and capacity-building efforts, contributing to the effective implementation of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.