Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351697›Full record

ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2026

Developing a Logic Model Framework for Community-Dwelling, Non-Familial Intergenerational Programmes.

Ludwig Grillich, Karolina Seidl, Alexander Pell, Jana Nikitin, Anton-Rupert Laireiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ludwig GrillichDepartment for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria. ludwig.grillich@donau-uni.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4202-1382
Karolina SeidlDepartment for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3658-5097
Alexander PellDepartment for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-1955
Jana NikitinDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1642-154X
Anton-Rupert LaireiterDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-6775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-dwelling, non-familial intergenerational programmes (IPs) have emerged as a promising approach to preventing social isolation and loneliness among older adults. However, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the key components, underlying mechanisms, and contextual factors involved in implementing such programmes. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive logic model framework for non-familial IPs to guide future programme design and implementation. A qualitative approach was employed to analyse the 'Post für Dich!' [Mail for You] programme in rural Lower Austria through semi-structured interviews with older adults, implementation agents, and community leaders, along with a focus group of primary school children, and a document analysis. The resulting logic model framework identifies critical inputs (e.g., local coordinator, engaged implementation agents, meeting spaces, programme flexibility), highlights the role of existing organisational settings in facilitating access to target groups, and outlines key activities (programme initiation, coordination, letter exchanges, and intergenerational events). It reports multifaceted benefits for participants, such as improved attitudes, dispelled age stereotypes, expanded social networks, and an enriched daily life for older adults. Potential community-level impacts, such as fostering multigenerational awareness and integration, are noted. This empirically grounded framework serves as a practical tool for systematically designing, implementing, and evaluating IPs across diverse settings. It can facilitate knowledge transfer, evidence-informed practice, and capacity-building efforts, contributing to the effective implementation of these interventions.

Indexed as

Independent LivingIntergenerational RelationsSocial IsolationAgedAustriaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLogicLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchRural PopulationCommunity engagementHealthy ageingIntergenerational programmesLogic modelLonelinessProgramme implementationQualitative researchSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID41351697
PMCPMC13046647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.