ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2025
Bridging the Gap in Secondary Antibody Deficiencies: Current Evidence and Unmet Needs in Diagnosis and Management with Immunoglobulin Replacement.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) represents a substantial yet under-recognised global healthcare burden. It is more prevalent than primary antibody deficiency, but frequently under-diagnosed and variably managed worldwide. Prompt diagnosis is often hindered by insufficient awareness among clinicians, lack of global consensus on screening/monitoring for SAD among at-risk patients, inadequate clinical immunology services and lack of standardised referral pathways/protocols. Management practices vary widely, with little international agreement, particularly regarding threshold to initiate immunoglobulin replacement, as well as regimen, dosage and frequency of immunoglobulin administration. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) replacement emerged as a promising alternative to traditional intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) replacement. IVIg requires monthly infusions in inpatient/day-hospital settings leading to high peak serum IgG and subsequent variations with end-of-cycle 'wear-off effect', causing more systemic side effects and increased risk of breakthrough infections, and disruption of daily life and employment. While previous evidence was largely derived from primary antibody deficiency, recent comparative studies on SAD patients indicate that SCIg replacement, through weekly self-administered infusions, can achieve more stable and higher trough serum IgG, lower infection rates, fewer systemic adverse reactions and enhanced health-related quality-of-life compared to IVIg. There is also potential cost-savings from the use of SCIg replacement. This review emphasises the urgent need for standardised guidelines on screening/diagnosis and treatment of SAD, and large-scale multi-centre trials and real-world studies on IVIg vs SCIg replacement among SAD patients, which will facilitate better identification, management, and health-outcomes for SAD patients, ultimately alleviating a significant global health challenge through coordinated clinical, research, and policy efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.