ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2025
Effects of Treatment with Dexmedetomidine on Neurochemical and Cognitive Alterations Induced by Sepsis in an Animal Model.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activation of α-2 adrenergic receptors (AR) may exert a protective role against neuronal injury. Clinically, dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective α-2 AR agonist, has been shown to reduce brain dysfunction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether DEX could prevent cognitive deficits induced by sepsis. Wistar rats were randomly assigned to five groups: (1) Sham; (2) sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP); (3) CLP + DEX; (4) CLP + idazoxan (IDA, an α-2 AR antagonist); and (5) CLP + IDA + DEX. At different time points after CLP, the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala were isolated for quantification of cytokines, α-2A and α-2C AR expression, and glutamate content. At 10 and 30 days post-CLP, cognitive function was assessed using the open field habituation, inhibitory avoidance, and novel object recognition tasks. DEX treatment improved performance across all cognitive tasks, and this effect was antagonized by co-administration of IDA. DEX reduced proinflammatory cytokine levels (IL-6 and IL-1β) 24 h after sepsis, and this anti-inflammatory effect was sustained at later time points, particularly for IL-1β in the hippocampus. Additionally, DEX decreased glutamate levels in the pre-frontal cortex and amygdala late after sepsis induction. DEX also regulated the expression of α-2 AR subtypes in a time- and region-specific manner. In conclusion, the protective effect of DEX on cognitive function appears to be the mainly affected by the regulation of glutamate levels, whose effects were receptor-dependent, in contrast to the majority of cytokines. However, it should be noted that the primary neuroprotective effect is driven by the direct, receptor-dependent functional agonism of DEX administered acutely after sepsis induction, and this acute mechanism subsequently triggers secondary, long-term structural adaptations that ultimately influence cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.