Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351648›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

Adjustments of balance control during cognitive dual tasking: Evidence from event-related force-plate analysis.

Anton Koger, Leif Johannsen, Andrea Kiesel, Hermann Müller, Denise Nadine Stephan, Elisa Ruth Straub, Iring Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anton KogerInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. anton.koger@psych.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6906-5184
Leif JohannsenInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-3163
Andrea KieselDepartment of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5564-010X
Hermann MüllerDepartment of Sports Science, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-3660
Denise Nadine StephanInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-3985
Elisa Ruth StraubDepartment of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-1600
Iring KochInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive-motor interference refers to the interaction between cognitive and motor processes occurring at the same time. Recently, balance control parameters while standing on a force plate were analysed using an event-related approach while participants performed a Simon task. Resolving response conflict in incongruent trials reduced balance adjustments prior to manual response execution, suggesting a bottleneck for concurrent cognitive and balance control. In the present study, we combined this approach with a cognitive dual task which comprised a visual-vocal short-term memory task with a delayed vocal response and an auditory-manual reaction time (RT) task. This hybrid psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm created a functional processing bottleneck during memory consolidation in the visual-vocal short-term memory task. To examine how this cognitive bottleneck influences balance control, 48 participants per experiment stood quietly on a force plate, and balance control was quantified as moment variability (mN·m) in 100 ms sliding windows. We varied the stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA: 100 vs. 1,000 ms) between the targets (Experiment 1) and task load (report vs. ignore the visual object; Experiment 2). As expected, auditory-manual RTs increased at short SOA, showing dual-task interference that persisted in ignore trials, consistent with task-set inertia. Force-plate data were analysed using cluster permutation analysis to identify time-specific effects. Participants were less likely to adjust balance during cognitive task processing and more likely after task completion, independent of the presence of a cognitive bottleneck. These findings suggest that balance control flexibly delays or advances balance adjustments based on cognitive demands, thereby reducing cognitive-motor interference. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study shows that when people are performing demanding cognitive tasks, such as remembering information while responding to auditory signals, balance adjustments can be temporarily reduced or altered, particularly when the cognitive tasks are difficult. These findings highlight the interaction of cognitive tasks and balance and specifically provide insights into how cognitive processes influence stability during standing. Our understanding of the mechanisms linking cognition and balance may guide future studies on how such interactions change with age or cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

CognitionExecutive FunctionMemory, Short-TermPostural BalancePsychomotor PerformanceRefractory Period, PsychologicalAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41351648
PMCPMC12681466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.