ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Effects of conventional yogurt, probiotic-enriched yogurt, and isolated probiotic on bone and heart parameters in a chronic kidney disease experimental model.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal digestion enhances the release of bioactive peptides from yogurt.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeto evaluate the effects of three interventions (conventional yogurt; probiotic yogurt, and isolated probiotic) on bone and heart parameters in a chronic kidney disease (CKD) model.
methodsmale Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: Nephrectomized Group (Nx, n = 8); Nx + Yogurt Group (NxY, n = 8); Nx + Probiotic-enriched Yogurt Group (NxPY, n = 8) and Nx + Probiotic Group (NxP, n = 8). Lactobacillus acidophilus La-05 (10
resultsThe NxPY group presented improvements in tibia parameters such as maximum strength (p = 0.02), maximum tension (p = 0.02), and breaking tension (p = 0.04) than the Nx group. On the other hand, NxY and NxP did not affect bone parameters. The NxPY group showed lower heart relative weight than the NxP group (p = 0.007). In the electrocardiogram, NxPY demonstrated shorter T wave duration (p = 0.002), QT (p = 0.006), and QTc (p = 0.003) interval duration compared to NxP. NxP worsened cardiac electrical activity as the increase in T wave duration (p = 0.03), QTc interval (p = 0.02), ST segment amplitude (p = 0.01), and raised cardiac hypertrophy including heart weight corrected for tibia length (p = 0.04) compared to Nx. Meanwhile, no significant difference was found between the NxY and Nx groups. Also, there were no significant differences in pCS levels among the groups Nx, NxY, NxPY and, NxP.
conclusionThis is the first study to compare these effects and revealed that supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophilus La‑05-enriched yogurt improved bone parameters, while isolated probiotic impaired electrical conduction and aggravated hypertrophy in the heart. On the other hand, conventional yogurt did not affect bone or heart parameters. These findings may help guide future clinical studies and recommendations, mainly about dairy products and probiotics in CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.