Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351635›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2025

Perioperative Continuous Propofol Infusion in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A 25-Year Retrospective Study.

Oluwatomini A Fashina, Grace M Arteaga, Sheri S Crow, Joseph A Dearani, Xai Khang, Nicole M Andrijasevic, Danette L Bruns, Ashley V Wong Grossman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oluwatomini A FashinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. tominifashina@gmail.com.
Grace M ArteagaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sheri S CrowDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joseph A DearaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xai KhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nicole M AndrijasevicDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Danette L BrunsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashley V Wong GrossmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pediatric cardiac critical care, patients often require specific anesthesia and sedation considerations due to unique physiological vulnerabilities. This study assessed the incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU) patients receiving continuous propofol infusion for non-procedural sedation. We conducted a retrospective review of post-operative congenital heart disease patients < 18 years admitted to the PCICU from 1/1/2000-9/30/2024, who received continuous propofol infusions ≥ 12 hours and/or ≥ 2.4 mg/kg/hour. The primary outcome was the incidence of PRIS. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and survival to hospital discharge. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and the Kruskal-Wallis test, stratified by physiological complexity (single vs. double ventricle) and surgical mortality risk scores (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery [STAT] score). A total of 641 patients were included. No statistically significant differences in propofol characteristics were found across physiologic or surgical risk groups. The median infusion rate was 1.2 mg/kg/hour, with a median duration of 22.7 hours. No cases of PRIS occurred. Survival to hospital discharge was 97%. The median ICU length of stay was 7.1 days. In this single center, retrospective study of post-operative congenital heart disease patients, continuous propofol infusion was not associated with any cases of PRIS. These findings support the cautious use of propofol in pediatric cardiac critical care. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate safety across the heterogenous congenital heart disease population, including those with single ventricle physiology.

Indexed as

Cardiac critical carePediatric critical carePerioperativePropofolSedation

Identifiers

PMID41351635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.