ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Perioperative Continuous Propofol Infusion in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A 25-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In pediatric cardiac critical care, patients often require specific anesthesia and sedation considerations due to unique physiological vulnerabilities. This study assessed the incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU) patients receiving continuous propofol infusion for non-procedural sedation. We conducted a retrospective review of post-operative congenital heart disease patients < 18 years admitted to the PCICU from 1/1/2000-9/30/2024, who received continuous propofol infusions ≥ 12 hours and/or ≥ 2.4 mg/kg/hour. The primary outcome was the incidence of PRIS. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and survival to hospital discharge. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and the Kruskal-Wallis test, stratified by physiological complexity (single vs. double ventricle) and surgical mortality risk scores (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery [STAT] score). A total of 641 patients were included. No statistically significant differences in propofol characteristics were found across physiologic or surgical risk groups. The median infusion rate was 1.2 mg/kg/hour, with a median duration of 22.7 hours. No cases of PRIS occurred. Survival to hospital discharge was 97%. The median ICU length of stay was 7.1 days. In this single center, retrospective study of post-operative congenital heart disease patients, continuous propofol infusion was not associated with any cases of PRIS. These findings support the cautious use of propofol in pediatric cardiac critical care. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate safety across the heterogenous congenital heart disease population, including those with single ventricle physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41351635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.