Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351544›Full record

ArticleHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

Dismantling behavioural weight management interventions: component network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and real-world services.

Nishant Jaiswal, Rebecca Gregg, Neil Hawkins, Sahar Sharif-Hurst, Alison Avenell, Louisa Ells, Sandra Jayacodi, Ruth Mackenzie, Sharon Anne Simpson, Olivia Wu and 2 more

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nishant JaiswalHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5511-4572
Rebecca GreggFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9119-1997
Neil HawkinsHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3199-221X
Sahar Sharif-HurstHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6885-0456
Alison AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4813-5628
Louisa EllsSchool of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-4832
Sandra JayacodiFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-3465
Ruth MackenzieSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-5038
Sharon Anne SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-1768
Olivia WuHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-6016
Jennifer LogueFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9549-2738
BE:COME Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Behavioural weight management interventions are complex interventions having several coexisting components designed to facilitate weight loss. Existing evidence has shown behavioural weight management interventions to be effective; however, the magnitude of weight loss varies among programmes. There is value in understanding whether differences in the intervention components influence the overall effectiveness of the interventions. The current study is the first attempt to explore the effects of individual components of interventions using data from both randomised controlled trials and real-world services based in the United Kingdom. Objective: To deconstruct behavioural weight management interventions into constituent components and identify the effectiveness of individual components for weight loss. Design: A component network meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials and real-world services. Setting: Real-world services and randomised controlled trials based in the United Kingdom for weight management in adults. Participants: Adults over 18 years of age, living in the United Kingdom and attending behavioural weight management interventions in the real world ( Main outcome measure: Mean change in weight after 12 weeks of active weight loss sessions. Methods: Bayesian two-staged component network meta-analysis using an additive model. Results: In the analysis of randomised controlled trials, significant weight loss was associated with components tailoring (mean difference -5.54 kg; 95% credible interval -7.72 to -3.35), flexibility in attendance (mean difference -3.18 kg; 95% credible interval -4.29 to -2.07) and multimodal referral (mean difference -2.57 kg; 95% credible interval -4.89 to -0.25). In real-world services, the components associated with significant weight loss included multimodal referral (mean difference -2.01, 95% credible interval -2.13 to -1.88), personalised dietary advice (mean difference -1.22, 95% credible interval -1.33 to -1.11), flexibility (mean difference -0.41, 95% credible interval -0.47 to -0.35) and in-person delivery (mean difference -0.45, 95% credible interval -0.52 to -0.38). However, co-design (mean difference 3.46 kg; 95% credible interval 2.12 to 4.82) in randomised controlled trials, and added extras (mean difference 0.99 kg; 95% credible interval 0.88 to 1.10) and tailoring (mean difference 0.33 kg; 95% credible interval 0.27 to 0.40) in real-world services, were not shown to be effective in short-term weight loss. Conclusions: The findings from this study highlight the importance of understanding the impact of intervention components such as accessibility, flexibility, tailoring and dietary advice and in-person delivery in weight loss at 12 weeks. Future research should consider exploring the component interactions and long-term weight loss for improved understanding and developing effective programmes. Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR129523.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyObesityWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomWeight LossANALYSISCOMPONENT NETWORK METAOBESITYOVERWEIGHTWEIGHT LOSS

Identifiers

PMID41351544
PMCPMC12703835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.