SynthesisBlood advances2026
Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older patients in recent registration trials for DLBCL.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) increases with older age. Thus, subgroup reporting for older adults in clinical trials is necessary to determine the relevance of novel therapy outcomes to this vulnerable population. This study assessed subgroup reporting of older adults (aged ≥65 years) enrolled in US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency registration trials for DLBCL between 2017 and 2023. Clinical efficacy end points for each trial were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov registry data and study protocols. Primary and secondary publications reporting on included studies were identified through a systematic review process within Covidence. Ten therapies with 12 indications were approved between 2017 and 2023. Ninety-two publications were included for data extraction. The availability and completeness of older adult subgroup data relating to protocol-defined efficacy end points, as well as data relating to baseline patient characteristics, health-related quality-of-life outcomes, and toxicity outcomes, were assessed according to predefined criteria. Of 12 primary end points, 10 (83.4%) were reported completely, 1 (8.3%) was reported partially, and 1 (8.3%) was not reported among older subgroups. Of 66 secondary end points, 25 (37.9%) were completely reported, 6 (9.1%) were partially reported, and 35 (53.1%) were unreported. Baseline characteristics, health-related quality-of-life outcomes, and toxicities outcomes among older adults were mostly unreported. This analysis highlights a need for improvement in older adult subgroup reporting in DLBCL trials, particularly among secondary end points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.