Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351467›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2026

Oscillations and Boundaries in My Route Through the Hippocampal Cognitive Map.

Neil Burgess

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neil BurgessUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-6584

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202805/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I outline my personal journey in hippocampal research from joining the O'Keefe lab in 1991 to the present, with a focus on earlier experimental and computational investigations of spatial cognition and neural representations in rodents, with some reference to extensions to humans and to other aspects of cognition. These recollections are organized around place cells and the role of theta rhythmicity, the importance of environmental boundaries, the operation of a wider system for spatial memory and imagery, grid cells, and the neural mechanisms of navigation in humans. I conclude with some reflections on the collaborative and exciting ecosystem that supported all of these endeavors.

Indexed as

CognitionHippocampusSpatial NavigationAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSpatial MemoryTheta Rhythmboundary vector cellgrid cellhippocampusplace celltheta

Identifiers

PMID41351467
PMCPMC12681186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.