ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Genomic signature driving preinvasive to invasive processes in stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Epithelial-Cell Progression Signatures (ECPSs) from Multi-Resolution Multi-Omics Data for Translational Clinical Applications in Lung Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic signature driving preinvasive to invasive processes in stage I lung adenocarcinoma.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progression from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) to invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is associated with a significantly worse prognosis and lacks predictive markers. The genomic molecular mechanisms of progression and genetic signatures mediating the MIA to IA transition in early-stage LUAD are still largely uncharacterized. In our study, a genomic signature driving MIA to IA was developed by 243 MIA and 532 IA stage I LUAD patients, and its ability to predict outcomes was validated in multiple cohorts. Among patients with stage I LUAD, 19 genes exhibited significant differences in frequency between MIA and IA groups, with notable enrichment in the MAPK, PI3K-Akt and ErbB pathways. A genomic signature of 11 genes associated with LUAD invasion progression, with TP53 and CDKN2A playing key functional roles, was developed and correlated with poor prognosis by internal and external cohorts (p < 0.05). The high-risk group exhibited elevated tumor mutational burden, mutation-allele tumor heterogeneity, and variant allele frequency values both in train and validation cohorts (p < 0.001). Mixed ground-glass opacity and solid nodules, predominantly larger than 1 cm, were more common in the high-risk population (p < 0.001), while the low-risk group exhibited a higher proportion of high-medium differentiated LUAD (p < 0.001). Our results reveal an 11-gene genomic signature driving invasive progression from MIA to IA associated with poor outcome in stage I LUAD patients by validating internal and external cohorts, radiological, pathological and tumor size, with potential future implications for disease monitoring, prognosis, and future therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.