ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Assessing the Impact of Whole Genome Duplication on Gene Expression and Regulation During Arachnid Development.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Conserved and diverged embryonic expression patterns of panarthropod NK-Cluster genes and new evidence for CRE-shuffling.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The genome of a sea spider corroborates a shared Hox cluster motif in arthropods with a reduced posterior tagma.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole genome duplication (WGD) generates a new genetic material that can contribute to the evolution of developmental processes and phenotypic diversification. A WGD occurred in an ancestor of arachnopulmonates (spiders, scorpions, and their relatives), which provides an important independent comparison to WGDs in other animal lineages. After WGD, arachnopulmonates retained many duplicated copies (ohnologues) of developmental genes including clusters of homeobox genes, many of which have been inferred to have undergone subfunctionalization. However, there has been little systematic analysis of gene regulatory sequences and comparison of the expression of ohnologues versus their single-copy orthologues between arachnids. Here, we compare the regions of accessible chromatin and gene expression of ohnologues and single-copy genes during three embryonic stages between an arachnopulmonate arachnid, the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum, and a nonarachnopulmonate arachnid, the harvestman Phalangium opilio. We found that the expression of each spider ohnologue was lower than their single-copy orthologues in the harvestman suggesting subfunctionalization. However, this was not reflected in a reduction in the number of peaks of accessible chromatin because both spider ohnologues and single-copy genes had more peaks than the orthologous harvestman genes. We also found that the number of peaks of accessible chromatin was higher in the late embryonic stage associated with activation of genes expressed later during embryogenesis in both species. Taken together, our study provides a genome-wide comparison of gene regulatory sequences and embryonic gene expression in arachnids and thus new insights into the impact of the arachnopulmonate WGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.