ArticleSmall methods2026
Characterization of Non-Specific Electrostatic Interactions of Cationic Peptides with DNA Origami and Their Functional Consequences.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The functionalization of DNA origami with peptides is a powerful strategy for creating nanodevices for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. A critical but often overlooked challenge is the non-specific electrostatic binding of cationic peptides to the anionic DNA nanostructure, which leads to uncontrolled stoichiometry and undermines functional predictability. Here, the study systematically characterizes this issue and demonstrates a practical purification strategy to mitigate it. It is quantitatively shown that cationic peptides associate with DNA origami in vast excess of their intended binding sites, a phenomenon not observed with anionic control peptides. This non-specific binding is confirmed to be electrostatic and is effectively screened by high salt. To address this, a charge-dependent purification approach is evaluated using polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, showing that cationic peptides require extensive purification (≥7 cycles), whereas anionic peptides need only minimal treatment (2 cycles) to achieve precise loading. Crucially, the study provides definitive functional evidence that a therapeutic peptide (brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mimicking peptide) must be attached via stable, site-specific hybridization to elicit a potent biological response; non-specifically adsorbed peptides are largely inactive. This work provides a set of critical design guidelines and purification considerations necessary for the rational design of reliable and functionally predictable DNA nanodevices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.