ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026
Adaptive Algal Cultivation Enabled by a Monthly Biomass Forecasting System.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Algal Cultivation Enabled by a Monthly Biomass Forecasting System.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Biology-aware scaling of microalgal biofuels: bioprocess constraints and data-centric digital twins.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microalgae offer a promising pathway for sustainable biofuel and bioproduct development, but outdoor cultivation is highly sensitive to environmental variability. To address this, the authors present an experimental monthly biomass forecasting system designed to guide operational decisions such as strain selection and pond water depth. Using the Biomass Assessment Tool (BAT) coupled with two forecasting approaches, a climatology-based method using data from Phase 2 of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2) and three models from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME), the authors evaluated biomass production strategies for two high-performing algal strains (Picochlorum celeri and Tetraselmis striata) across four pond depths (15-30 cm) from 2020 to 2024 in Arizona. One of the NMME models achieved the highest selection accuracy, correctly identifying the optimal strain and pond depth in 84% of the months, with model accuracies across the NMME suite ranging from 74% to 84%. In comparison, the NLDAS-2 climatology-based approach achieved a 78% accuracy. Strain selection was consistently more accurate than pond depth selection across all methods, with one NMME model and the NMME multi-model ensemble achieving up to 92% accuracy in strain prediction. Simulation results show that forecast-informed approaches increased average biomass yields by 15% over the current State-of-Technology strategy, with gains exceeding 40% in certain months. These results highlight the potential of forecast-guided strategies to enhance biomass production and enable more adaptive, weather-resilient microalgae cultivation. The system is scalable to additional strains and geographic regions, offering a flexible tool for advancing sustainable algal production under increasingly variable environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.