Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351207›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

Adaptive Algal Cultivation Enabled by a Monthly Biomass Forecasting System.

Hongxiang Yan, Song Gao, Mark S Wigmosta, Andre M Coleman, Ning Sun, Michael H Huesemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongxiang YanEnergy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-403X
Song GaoMarine Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7210-4445
Mark S WigmostaEnergy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-8284
Andre M ColemanEnergy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3221-3727
Ning SunEnergy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4094-4482
Michael H HuesemannMarine Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4348-6368

Funding

This study by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was supported by the Bioenergy Technologies Office within the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the US Department of Energy (DOE).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae offer a promising pathway for sustainable biofuel and bioproduct development, but outdoor cultivation is highly sensitive to environmental variability. To address this, the authors present an experimental monthly biomass forecasting system designed to guide operational decisions such as strain selection and pond water depth. Using the Biomass Assessment Tool (BAT) coupled with two forecasting approaches, a climatology-based method using data from Phase 2 of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2) and three models from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME), the authors evaluated biomass production strategies for two high-performing algal strains (Picochlorum celeri and Tetraselmis striata) across four pond depths (15-30 cm) from 2020 to 2024 in Arizona. One of the NMME models achieved the highest selection accuracy, correctly identifying the optimal strain and pond depth in 84% of the months, with model accuracies across the NMME suite ranging from 74% to 84%. In comparison, the NLDAS-2 climatology-based approach achieved a 78% accuracy. Strain selection was consistently more accurate than pond depth selection across all methods, with one NMME model and the NMME multi-model ensemble achieving up to 92% accuracy in strain prediction. Simulation results show that forecast-informed approaches increased average biomass yields by 15% over the current State-of-Technology strategy, with gains exceeding 40% in certain months. These results highlight the potential of forecast-guided strategies to enhance biomass production and enable more adaptive, weather-resilient microalgae cultivation. The system is scalable to additional strains and geographic regions, offering a flexible tool for advancing sustainable algal production under increasingly variable environmental conditions.

Indexed as

BiomassChlorophytaMicroalgaeBiofuelsForecastingBiofuelsHuesemann Algae Biomass Growth Modelmonthly biomass forecastingPicochlorum celeripond water depthstrain selectionTetraselmis striata

Identifiers

PMID41351207
PMCPMC12883906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.