Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351154›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Communication skills in pediatrics: validation of a training course for students.

Glenia Junqueira Machado Medeiros, Simone Appenzeller

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Glenia Junqueira Machado MedeirosDepartament of Pediatric Health, School of Medicine of Itajubá, Itajubá, Minas Gerais, Brazil. gleniajmmedeiros@gmail.com.
Simone AppenzellerGraduation Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq305981/2023-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pediatrics, effective communication requires empathy, active engagement with the child and their family, and a mutual sense of trust. Difficulties in communication and low confidence among medical students when interviewing pediatric patients may be associated with the lack of formal training in communication skills during undergraduate education and the limited integration of this content into medical curricula.

objectiveTo develop, validate, and implement a pediatric communication skills course for medical students, evaluating its effectiveness, acceptance, and impact on students’ self-perception and performance.

methodsThis is a methodological study developed in five stages: (1) Course design, based on leading protocols and literature on pediatric communication, and guided by gaps identified in a prior study on students’ perceptions of communication skills in pediatrics; (2) Content validation using the Delphi technique, with 11 experts evaluating the adequacy of course elements; (3) Pilot testing to adjust the course structure and teaching strategies; (4) Course implementation with 27 eighth-semester medical students, delivered as a voluntary extension activity; and (5) Evaluation using quantitative tools, and statistical analysis. All participants signed informed consent and assent forms. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee.

resultsThe course was developed based on established protocols and validated by 11 experts through the Delphi technique, achieving high content validity (CVI > 0.8). In the pilot phase, the course was well accepted, deemed relevant to its purpose (I-CVI = 1.0), and was recommended by the participants. In the subsequent administration with 27 students, all scored above 80% on the post-test. There was a significant improvement in students’ self-perceived communication skills, particularly in opening the discussion, gathering information, and understanding the patient’s and family’s perspective. Statistical analysis showed a significant association between increased confidence and the ability to interview children (p < 0.0001), caregivers (p = 0.0052) and adolescents (p = 0.0032), and communicate effectively (p = 0.0005).

conclusionsThe pediatric communication skills course developed and validated in this study proved to be an effective and well-accepted intervention to enhance medical students’ communication competencies. Expert validation ensured content quality, while implementation with students demonstrated significant gains in performance and confidence for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePediatricsStudents, MedicalDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsChild healthClinical competenceCommunication interventionCommunication skills trainingCommunication trainingContinuing medical educationInterpersonal communicationMedical educationPediatricsPhysician-patient communicationUndergraduate medical educationValidation study

Identifiers

PMID41351154
PMCPMC12797637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.