ArticleBMC cancer2025
Smart exercise in pediatric oncology: enhancing executive functions through cognitively challenging physical activity- a non-randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06839794 (An Investigator Initiated, Non-randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity on Executive Functions in Paediatric Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Investigator Initiated, Non-randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity on Executive Functions in Paediatric Cancer Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChildren and adolescents, diagnosed with cancer, frequently develop physical and cognitive impairments. Hence, cancer and its treatments contribute to reduced physical activity (PA) and cognitive impairments, particularly in executive functions (EFs). Research indicates that PA in school children improves EFs, with cognitively challenging PA offering potential additional benefits. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of cognitively challenging PA during acute cancer care on cognitive and physical performance, as well as mental health.
methodsThis prospective, two-arm, non-randomized, multicenter controlled study will take place at four pediatric oncology centers in Switzerland. In the intervention group the effect of cognitively challenging PA (n = 35) will be compared with standard care plus PA recommendations in the control group (n = 35) in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with cancer aged 6-17.99 years. The twelve-week cognitively challenging PA intervention consists of three-weekly 45-minute individualized and supervised sessions incorporating cognitive elements. Assessments of EFs, motor abilities, cardiovascular health, health-related quality of life, fatigue, and physical and psychosocial functioning will be conducted at baseline, six weeks, twelve weeks, and a six month follow-up. All participants in the intervention and control group will receive PA recommendations during the intervention period and an offer for post-therapy PA counseling. DISCUSSION: Childhood is a crucial period for brain and motor development, rendering young cancer patients especially vulnerable to cognitive and physical impairments from the disease and its treatment. This study is the first to implement cognitively challenging PA tailored to pediatric cancer patients with the aim to enhance EFs by activating brain networks responsible for higher-order processes, physical performance and mental health. The findings will provide insights into the role of cognitively challenging PA and explore its integration into standard care to improve quality of life for childhood cancer survivors.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06839794) and German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00036573).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.