ArticleBMC neurology2025
Neurological complications following cerebral angiography: a case of contrast-induced encephalopathy.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a rare but increasingly recognized iatrogenic complication associated with the use of intravascular iodinated contrast agents, particularly during neurovascular procedures. It often presents with acute neurological deficits that mimic ischemic strokes or seizure disorders. Despite its often reversible course, radiological and electroclinical mimicry of other acute conditions poses a diagnostic dilemma. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an 82-year-old woman with multiple vascular comorbidities who developed acute left hemiparesis and conjugate gaze deviation after diagnostic cerebral angiography. Initial non-contrast CT revealed a dense right middle cerebral artery (MCA) sign, raising concerns about acute large vessel occlusion. However, subsequent angiography revealed no occlusions. Supportive neurocritical care, including hydration and anticonvulsant therapy, resulted in complete neurological recovery within five days. Electroencephalography (EEG) revealed decreased amplitude, indicating focal cortical dysfunction in the right hemisphere without epileptiform activity. Interval imaging confirmed the resolution of right hemispheric edema.
conclusionThis case underscores the diagnostic challenges of CIE, particularly its ability to radiologically and clinically mimic acute ischemic strokes. The absence of EEG epileptiform discharges, despite convulsive symptoms, highlights the non-epileptic mechanisms underlying contrast-induced neurotoxicity. Enhanced interdisciplinary awareness and radiologic vigilance are essential to prevent unnecessary interventions and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.