Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41351130›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Development of a practice-based skills measure for community-based organizations implementing evidence-based interventions to advance equity.

Jennifer L Cruz, Scott R Rosas, Shoba Ramanadhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer L CruzHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jencruz@g.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-743X
Scott R RosasConcept Systems, Inc., 136 E State St, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Shoba RamanadhanHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

U Mass Boston / DFHCC U54 Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA156732 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI WENDY Beth LONDON · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
The Harvard Chan Education Program in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Karen M. Emmons, ANNE LINDSAY FRAZIER · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS 2T32CA057711-28NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057711NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156732NCI NIH HHS U54CA156732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based organizations (CBOs) are well-positioned to deliver evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to communities facing health inequities. However, CBO practitioners do not typically have the opportunity to build the necessary skills for EBI delivery. Few validated measures assess EBI skill levels among CBO practitioners, limiting the development and evaluation of capacity-building interventions. Additionally, capacity-building models typically represent academics' views of the subject, with little incorporation of practitioner voices. Thus, we sought to develop a new measure of EBI skills among CBO practitioners.

methodsDrawing on existing measures, qualitative research, and group concept mapping processes that privileged practitioner and academic expertise, we developed a 54-item instrument covering 10 core EBI skill domains (assessing needs, collaborating with partners, identifying evidence-based programs, adapting for context, implementing; evaluating and iterating; community engagement; planning for sustainability; managing; and funding). After conducting cognitive testing (n = 12), the instrument was administered online to CBO practitioners with at least 3 years of practice experience who served populations experiencing health inequities. Complete case factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted using R.

resultsParticipants included 314 respondents, 96% of whom (n = 304) were included in this analysis. They predominantly identified as Black or African American (31%) and White (30%), female (76%), social workers (45%), having 3-5 years of work experience, and were predominantly from the Northeast region of the United States. All work with populations experiencing health inequities. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed measure reliability of a 24-item version with Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Factor loadings indicated three underlying domains: 1) community needs and partnerships to support implementation, 2) community engagement to support implementation, and 3) evaluation and adaptation of EBIs.

conclusionsThis study is the first step towards a validated, practitioner-informed measure of EBI skills tailored to the unique contexts of CBOs addressing inequities, contributing to the growing literature on capacity-building for EBI implementation in community settings. By centering practitioner perspectives and aligning with long-term health promotion goals, this measure offers a practical tool for strengthening the foundational skills necessary to address health inequities. Future research should explore its application in diverse CBO contexts and assess its impact on EBI implementation and health equity outcomes.

Indexed as

Based interventionsBased organizationsBuildingCapacityCommunityEvidenceHealth equityPractitioners

Identifiers

PMID41351130
PMCPMC12797631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.