ArticleMalaria journal2025
Malaria control in Northern Ghana: a scoping review.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the achievements of the Ghana Health Service and its partners in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality in Ghana, the disease still poses a significant public health problem and a huge expenditure on the National Health Insurance Scheme and the economy. This review examined the strategies employed to control malaria in northern Ghana, explored the progress made, and discussed the challenges that persist. METHODS AND
resultsA literature search was conducted across four databases-Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library-to identify studies conducted in Northern Ghana on malaria control interventions between 1st January 2013 and 10th June 2023. The data were handled using Covidence; of the 1782 studies identified, 38 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The data were analysed with MS Excel and presented in tables. Most of the studies (44.7%) were conducted in the Upper East region and mostly included pregnant women (19%), children (14%) and malaria patients (14.3%). Most of the studies used quantitative methodology and were mostly concentrated on malaria case management (28.9%), Intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp, 23.7%), and Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs, 15.8%). The least common researched area was the malaria vaccine (2.6%).
conclusionsThe most common strategies used were case management, LLINs, IPTp and LLITNs. However, there was no regional or intervention balance in the number of studies conducted. Further studies are required on the combined effects of these interventions as well as larval source management and malaria vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.