ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Radiographic reliability of anatomical knee landmarks for joint line determination in healthy adults.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe correct identification of the knee joint line is essential for successful primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Small misalignments can cause restricted range of motion, patellofemoral maltracking, and extensor mechanism imbalance leading to pain and functional impairment. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of five radiographic anatomical landmarks - the fibular head, inferior patellar pole, tibial tubercle, and both femoral epicondyles - for estimating the joint line level in healthy Turkish adults.
methodsA retrospective radiographic analysis was conducted on 100 healthy adults (61 male, 39 female; 18-50 years). Perpendicular distances from these five bony landmarks to the joint line were measured digitally by two independent observers using a PACS system under standardized calibration to minimize projection errors. Inter-observer reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Power analysis was based on the fibular-head-joint-line (FH-JL) distance as the primary outcome measure.
resultsThe FH-JL distance measured 11.4 ± 1.8 mm with a coefficient of variation of 15.8%, showing the highest reliability. Sex-based differences were significant (11.8 mm in men vs. 10.7 mm in women, p = 0.002). ICC values for all measurements ranged from 0.91 to 0.96, indicating excellent agreement between observers. No age-related differences were found (p = 0.835). The fibular head showed strong correlations with both epicondyles (r = 0.724 and r = 0.689).
conclusionIn healthy adults, the fibular head serves as a reliable radiologic landmark that may assist in joint line restoration during revision TKA, pending validation in clinical settings. The study also acknowledges its limitations of using plain radiographs and excluding the adductor tubercle as a reference point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.