ArticleHereditas2025
Performance of a self-developed panel for biogeographic ancestry inference and dissection of the genetic background of three Tibetan groups.
Article in Hereditas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we used a panel consisting of 56 autosomal ancestry-informative insertion/deletions (AIM-InDels) for biogeographic ancestry inference, three Y-InDels, and one Amelogenin gene, and verified its performance in Gannan Tibetan, Qinghai Tibetan, and Tibet Tibetan groups. Meanwhile, we analyzed the genetic structures of these three Tibetan groups.
resultsThe results showed that 56 AIM-InDels performed better at classifying African and East Asian individuals without noisy labels compared with other intercontinental populations. By the addition of noisy labels, the SVM model was robust when the proportion of noisy labels was small. Furthermore, the African and East Asian populations showed better performance than the other three intercontinental populations. And the 56 AIM-InDels could be used for individual identification and full sibling identification of three Tibetan groups. Population genetic analysis of three Tibetan groups showed that their genetic structures were similar to East Asian populations.
conclusionsThis panel can not only be effectively used for biogeographic ancestry inference in African and East Asian populations but also provide insights into the genetic structures of three Tibetan groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.