SynthesisBMC oral health2025
Training of non-dental healthcare professionals in the management of dental trauma: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental trauma constitutes the second most common cause of emergency dental care worldwide, after cavities, accounting for approximately 5% of all physical injuries across all age groups. Early intervention is crucial, especially for children and adolescents, who present a higher incidence due to their active lifestyle. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and descriptive analysis to assess the level of knowledge among non-dental healthcare professionals in the management of dental trauma, identifying gaps in their education and proposing educational interventions to improve care in this critical field.
methodsThis systematic review was structured according to the SPIDER strategy: population, non-dental healthcare professionals, exposure to a clinical situation, management of dental trauma and outcome knowledge, attitude and awareness. The included studies were analyzed descriptively. Mean values and other summary statistics reported in each study were extracted and organized according to the primary variables of interest, focusing on the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of non-dental healthcare professionals. Due to the substantial heterogeneity in study designs, measurement tools, and response formats, no pooled or inferential analyses were performed. The articles were analyzed by the authors and summarized using a "KAP Heat Map" approach, in which colors indicated the level of knowledge (< 25%, 25-50%, 51-75%, and > 75%), and the width of the columns represented the number of studies for each question stem (QS), based on data reported in the included studies.
resultsOnly two studies of 25 concluded that the level of knowledge was adequate, seven studies indicated a moderate level of knowledge, and sixteen studies reported an inadequate level of knowledge. Twelve of the included studies mention the need for continuing education in dental trauma for health professionals. Most included studies exhibited moderate to high risk of bias.
conclusionsThe studies reviewed showed that the level of knowledge of health professionals such as doctors and nurses is inadequate. This shows a lack of training during their academic training as well as a lack of training in the workplace.
trial registrationThis systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO with CD CRD578189 on August 9, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.