ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Variation of disability courses in Danish chiropractic patients with low back pain: a one-year cohort study with four follow-ups.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Depressive symptoms score and risk of incident spinal pain in middle-aged and elderly populations: a prospective cohort study based on china health and retirement longitudinal study data.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical course of low back pain (LBP) is highly variable. While some recover quickly, others experience prolonged or fluctuating disability. Understanding this heterogeneity, and the factors that influences it, is important for effective clinical management and for communicating realistic prognosis to patients. The aims of this study were to describe the variation in disability courses among chiropractic patients with LBP and to investigate how selected biopsychosocial characteristics measured at baseline can predict these courses and potentially explain the observed variation.
methodsLongitudinal data from 2,777 Danish adults consulting chiropractors for a new episode of LBP were analysed. Disability was measured at baseline, 2, 13, and 52 weeks using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (0-100 scale). Latent Class Analysis was applied to identify disability trajectories. Associations between baseline patient characteristics and trajectory class membership were examined across demographic, psychological and social domains. A post hoc composite index score was developed to summarize the cumulative burden of unfavourable baseline characteristics.
resultsNine distinct disability trajectories were identified, ranging from rapid recovery to persistent high disability, and fluctuating patterns. Six classes accounted for approximately 90% of patients, while three smaller classes with more irregular trajectories accounted for 10%. Higher number of MSK pain sites, comorbidities, and higher levels of BMI, depression, anxiety, kinesiophobia, prescription analgesic use, and poorer general health were associated with increased likelihood of belonging to less favourable trajectories. Both individual baseline characteristics and the index score combining these characteristics showed a clear dose-response relationship with disability trajectories. Patients with higher burden were more likely to follow less favourable trajectories. However, substantial variation remained within index groups, indicating that baseline characteristics alone cannot fully predict individual outcomes.
conclusionAmong chiropractic patients with LBP, trajectories of disability over one year can vary substantially in pattern. Baseline biopsychosocial characteristics influence trajectories and prognosis in a cumulative, dose-dependent manner. Clinicians should be aware of this variability and tailor communication about expectations accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.