ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
All-cause and cause-specific mortality in older people with and without diabetes in Norwegian home care services: a nationwide registry study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the number of older people living at home increases, the role of home care services (HCS) becomes more important. Diabetes is associated with premature mortality and is common among older people in HCS, yet mortality patterns among HCS recipients are not well known. This study aimed to estimate all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk in persons with pharmacologically treated diabetes receiving HCS compared to other HCS recipients and explore whether mortality risk differed between diabetes treatment subgroups.
methodsThis nationwide registry study merged data from the Norwegian Information System for the Nursing and Care Sector with data from the Norwegian Prescription Database, the Norwegian Patient Registry, and the Cause of Death Registry (CDR). The study population included recipients of HCS (aged 65-90 years at baseline) in Norway between 2009 and 2014. Individuals were classified as having pharmacologically treated diabetes (hereafter referred to as diabetes) (≥ 1 prescription of glucose-lowering drugs (GLD) in the current half year or the year before), or not having diabetes. Those with diabetes were further sub-classified into "non-insulin GLD only", "insulin and non-insulin GLD", or "insulin only". Time of death and the underlying cause of death were retrieved from CDR. The study population, diabetes status, covariates, and all-cause mortality were updated each half-year. Mortality risk was compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards regression, with age as time scale, and reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs.
resultsWomen in the "insulin only" group had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.18 (CI 1.11-1.25)) than women without diabetes, while in the "non-insulin GLD only" and "insulin and non-insulin GLD" subgroups, both women and men with diabetes had lower mortality risks than those without diabetes. Overall, persons with diabetes had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.23 (CI 1.19-1.28)) compared to persons without diabetes, and a lower risk of dying from cancer (HR 0.68 (CI 0.66-0.70)) and respiratory disease (HR 0.67 (CI 0.62-0.72)).
conclusionMortality risk varied by diabetes status and treatment subgroups. Most diabetes subgroups had lower all-cause mortality risk than those without diabetes, except for women using "insulin only", underscoring the need for individualized HCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.