ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Association between left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and circadian blood pressure pattern in arterial hypertension.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the relationship between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and circadian blood pressure (BP) pattern in arterial hypertension (AH).
methodsA total of 96 patients with AH of I-II grades were examined. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a high-end ultrasound device GE Vivid 7 Pro (USA). 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring was carried out using a Microlife Watch BP 03 device on the non-dominant arm. Statistical analysis of the obtained results was carried out using the Statistica 10.0 application package.
resultsAfter echocardiography all patients were divided into two groups. The first group is patients with AH and LVDD (n = 37), second group is patients with AH without LVDD (n = 59). The dipper pattern of systolic BP (SBP) was significantly more common in patients in the second group (p = 0.014). The non-dipper pattern of diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly more common in patients of group 1 (p = 0.047). The odds ratio of LVDD developing in patients with AH and a non-dipper pattern of SBP and DBP was 2.907 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.233–6.852) and 3.329 (95% CI 1.346–8.234), respectively.
conclusionA non-dipper pattern of SBP and DBP was significantly associated with LVDD and may be a therapeutic target for preservation of the diastolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.