Trial reportGeroScience2026
Comparing rehabilitation with and without neuromuscular electrical stimulation in hospitalized older adults: Cognitive, functional, and acceptability outcomes from a pragmatic pilot study.
Trial report in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a non-invasive therapeutic approach offering targeted muscle contraction without requiring voluntary effort. This pragmatic pilot study investigated the effects of integrating NMES into usual rehabilitation care on cognitive and mobility outcomes, as well as its acceptance among hospitalized older adults in rehabilitation settings. Twenty-nine older adults with a mean age of 81.7 years (SD = 9.0) participated in this study. Patients received either usual rehabilitation care alone (5 days/week) or NMES in addition to usual rehabilitation care (3 days/week) for three weeks. Cognitive function and mobility were assessed pre- and post-intervention, and NMES acceptability was measured using an 8-item questionnaire. Integrating NMES to usual rehabilitation care significantly improved cognitive flexibility, demonstrated by reduced task-switching errors (p = 0.03). No additional benefits were observed in other cognitive or mobility measures, although all participants showed mobility improvements over time. NMES was considered acceptable by older adults in the rehabilitation setting.Integrating NMES into usual rehabilitation is well accepted by hospitalized older adults, with preliminary evidence suggesting it may improve cognitive flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.