ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Reference Standard Calibration Challenges in the Case of Erythropoietin: Impact on Potency and Biosimilarity Determination.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
International reference standards have been established as gold standards for several biological products. Use of international units can drive consistency and standardization for biosimilar products across manufacturers. However, our research and development for Retacrit® (epoetin alfa-epbx), the first and only biosimilar FDA approved for all indications of Epogen®/Procrit® (epoetin alfa), showed that use of a compendial reference standard overestimated the potency of both the biosimilar and the originator product. Possible causes are or imprecision in the methods used to assign potency, or differences in the isoform composition between the compendial reference standard and product. Tracing the history of international reference standard potency assignment for erythropoietin provided insight into this issue. An internal product specific reference standard and process for qualifying and maintaining future replacements are recommended. Use of specific activity as compared to percent potency or units/mL was a useful tool and can provide a means to normalize data from multiple methods and samples with differences in labelled activity from various manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41350961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.