ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neuroticism heterogeneity through item-level associations in resting-state functional connectivity.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroticism is characterized by emotional instability and increased susceptibility to stress-related disorders. While traditionally treated as a unitary construct, growing evidence suggests that neuroticism is heterogeneous in both its genetic basis and its effects on social and health outcomes. To quantify this heterogeneity at the neurofunctional level, we analyzed resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in a large sample (n = 33,180) from the UK Biobank dataset. Using machine learning regression analysis, we identified RSFC patterns associated with item-level responses from the neuroticism scale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The pattern of RSFC associations across questionnaire items reflected genetically defined clusters (Worry and Depressed Affect), showing a significant correlation (r = 0.767, p < 0.001). It also aligned with psychometrically derived factors (Anxiety/Tension and Worry/Vulnerability), reflecting a factor structure consistent with prior psychological studies. These findings were replicated in a separate MRI scan session from the UK biobank dataset. Associated connectivity was primarily observed in cognitive control, sensory integration, and self-referential processing networks. These neurofunctional signatures position RSFC as a robust intermediate phenotype, bridging genetic predisposition for neuroticism and psychological states. This framework could enhance precision in predicting psychiatric vulnerability and inform tailored therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.