Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350904›Full record

ArticleBMC chemistry2025

Validation of experimental and gradient boosting regressor model for predicting performance, combustion, emission, and biomedical implications of cerium oxide (CeO₂)-augmented B20 biodiesel blends derived from used temple oil.

Ganesh Krishnappa, Devarahalli Kempegowda Ramesha, Seetharamapura Balaji Anjappa, Praveena Bindiganavile Anand, Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ganesh KrishnappaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, 560064, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-7471
Devarahalli Kempegowda RameshaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Visvesvaraya College of Engineering, Bengaluru, 560001, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3480-4109
Seetharamapura Balaji AnjappaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brindavan College of Engineering, Bangalore, 562175, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9473-9460
Praveena Bindiganavile AnandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, 560064, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7250-4599
Abdulfatah Abdu YusufDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Liberia, Monrovia, 1000, Montserrado, Liberia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-9022
Muhammad Imam AmmarullahBioengineering and Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Liberia, Monrovia, 1000, Montserrado, Liberia. imamammarullah@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-7202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global decline in fossil fuel availability and rising environmental concerns have intensified the search for sustainable alternative fuels, with biodiesel emerging as a promising option. This study investigates the performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of a B20 biodiesel blend derived from Used Temple Oil Methyl Ester (UTOME) enhanced with cerium oxide (CeO₂) nano additives. Conducted at constant speed and varying engine loads, the experiments show that CeO₂ additives significantly enhance brake thermal efficiency (BTE), with the B20UTOME100CeO₂ blend achieving efficiency levels comparable to pure diesel. Specific fuel consumption (SFC) decreases as CeO₂ concentration increases, reflecting enhanced fuel efficiency, while higher cylinder pressure (CP) and net heat release (NER) signify improved combustion processes. Emission analysis reveals substantial reductions in hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), with the B20UTOME100CeO₂ blend demonstrating the lowest HC and NOx emissions due to better fuel atomization, improved combustion efficiency, and lower peak combustion temperatures enabled by the CeO₂ nanoparticles. The B20UTOME100CeO₂ blend demonstrated enhanced performance at maximum load, exhibiting a 1.57% increase in Brake Thermal Efficiency, a 6.67% reduction in Specific Fuel Consumption, a 2.83% elevation in cylinder pressure, and a 5.95% greater heat release when compared to conventional diesel. Emissions analysis revealed a significant reduction in carbon monoxide by 66.67%, hydrocarbons by 13.51%, and nitrogen oxides by 0.20% relative to diesel. A gradient boosting regressor model was trained on experimental data comprising fish oil biodiesel blends with nanoparticle additives, utilizing Python libraries. The accuracy of the model is supported by a mean squared error of 0.7647 for HC emissions and R² scores of 0.9247 and 0.9882 for HC and NOx emissions, respectively. Overall, the results indicate that B20UTOME with 100 ppm CeO₂ additives offers a viable alternative to diesel, providing improved thermal efficiency, enhanced combustion, and reduced harmful emissions. The marked reduction in toxic emissions, including CO, HC, and NOx, carries significant biomedical relevance. These pollutants are known to induce respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders upon prolonged exposure. Therefore, implementing CeO₂-enhanced biodiesel blends offers a potential strategy for protecting public health by diminishing harmful exhaust emissions.

Indexed as

BiodieselBiomedicalGradient boosting regressor modelNano additives

Identifiers

PMID41350904
PMCPMC12784564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.