ArticleBMC medical education2025
Clinical knowledge, practice patterns, and educational needs on incidental lung nodules among interns, residents, and general practitioners in Palestine.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncidental lung nodules (ILNs) are increasingly detected through imaging, posing clinical and psychological challenges for healthcare providers, especially when local guidelines are lacking. This study assessed knowledge and fear related to ILNs among interns, residents, and general practitioners (GPs) in Palestine.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed via social media platforms to interns, residents, and GPs across Palestine. The validated tool assessed demographics, knowledge, emotional responses, clinical practices, and perceived barriers regarding ILNs. SPSS version 25 was used for statistical analysis.
resultsThe mean age was 26 (± 3.22) years; 53% were female. A majority of the participants (54%) were interns, and 83% had two or fewer years of professional experience. While 68% of participants reported being aware of ILN management guidelines, only 6% rated their understanding of these guidelines as excellent, and more than half (51%) indicated that they did not utilize any guidelines. The median knowledge score was 4 out of 7 [IQR: 2]. Female participants and those who received training in Palestine achieved significantly higher scores (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). Common management strategies included reviewing previous imaging (44%) and referring patients to specialists (30%). The primary barriers to effective ILN management were identified as insufficient training (62%) and limited clinical exposure (50.3%).
conclusionThis study reveals significant deficiencies in knowledge and confidence regarding ILNs among early-career clinicians in Palestine. The findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, the development of local guidelines, and increased clinical exposure to enhance competence and alleviate anxiety in managing incidental findings. Addressing these gaps is crucial for ensuring accurate diagnosis, appropriate follow-up, and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.