ArticleScientific reports2025
An in silico approach for screening non-synonymous SNPs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis PPE68 protein and impact on structure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PPE68 has been implicated through computational methods in ethambutol (EMB) resistance, plausibly through gene-gene interactions with embA. The interest of the current study was to use in silico approaches to gain insights into the effects of mutations on the structure and function of PPE68. Drug-resistant clinical isolate sequences from the NCBI Database were studied. PPE68 missense nsSNPs were analysed using bioinformatics tools. Isolated sequences which harboured mutations that could be key in driving a drug-resistant phenotype were selected for structural modelling and molecular dynamics simulations- mutations likely occurring in conserved regions of the N-terminal domain, including A26T/Q92K, L163F/L167R, L167P, L167R and E44G. The 83 sequences that were aligned exhibited some clustering with an interest on the variants A26T/Q92K, L167P, L167R and L163F/L167R appearing to cluster together, with the exception of E44G. There was a significant shift in the conformation of the mutants with A26T/Q92K (9.99 ± 2.05 Å) and L167P (10.03 ± 2.14 Å), undergoing the greatest change. L163F/L167R and A26T/Q92K displayed the most stability, whilst being the most loosely packed. This is in contrast to the unstable E44G, L167P and L167R which were more compact than the wildtype. Considering that the PPE family of proteins are highly disordered in their native form and presumably in their most stable conformation, these outcomes are conceivable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.