Observational studySurgical endoscopy2026
Surgical efficiency, safety, and quality of life among four various approaches for T1 stage papillary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to comprehensively evaluate surgical efficiency and quality of life (QoL) differences among Conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy trans-axillary approach (GETTA), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), and endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral-areolar approach (ETBAA) in T1 papillary thyroid carcinoma (T1-PTC) patients. STUDY
designProspective observational cohort study.
settingTertiary academic center.
methods463 female patients with T1-PTC were stratified into four cohorts: GETTA (n = 122), TOETVA (n = 108), COT (n = 128), and ETBAA (n = 105). Perioperative time periods were divided into five parts for analysis. Level VI lymph node dissection was routinely performed, and the yield is reported. QoL was assessed using Voice Impairment Score (VIS), Swallowing Impairment Score (SIS), Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR-Q), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90). Longitudinal QoL trends were evaluated during postoperative recovery.
resultsSignificant intergroup disparities were observed in surgical efficiency (P < 0.001); COT demonstrated superior time efficiency. All cohorts experienced transient postoperative QoL declines, with endoscopic groups showing accelerated recovery trajectories in physical, psychological, and cosmetic domains (P < 0.001).
conclusionFour techniques are safe and effective. COT remains the most time-efficient approach, while TOETVA excels in cosmesis. GETTA and ETBAA offer intermediate advantages, combining reasonable efficiency with enhanced recovery profiles. Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific factors, including cosmetic preferences and recovery priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41350787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.