ArticleBMC psychology2025
Amharic version of the work-life balance scale: validation and psychometric properties.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWork-life balance scale needs to be validated and adapted across various profession and socio-cultural contexts.The aim of this study was to assess the factor structures and psychometric properties of the work-life balance scale for health professionals working in hospitals in the Eastern Ethiopian context.
methodsA sample of 338 health professionals (of which 50.6% were female and 49.4% were male) from three public and three private hospitals were selected through simple random and stratified proportional sampling techniques.
resultsThe number of factors was determined using maximum likelihood with the promax rotation method and exploratory factor analysis, where four factors were extracted from the work-life balance scale, namely 'personal life enhancement of work, 'work enhancement of personal life, 'personal life interference with work', and 'work interference with personal life. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, validity and reliability analysis were employed as methods of data analysis. In conclusion, the work-life balance scale showed strong psychometric properties and can be used as reliable instruments to assess and measure the work-life balance of health professionals.
conclusionThe Amharic version of work-life balance scale proves valid and reliable tool for health professionals working in hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia. However, it requires further culturally appropriate revision through involving other large samples of health professionals across all parts of Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.