Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350738›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Is the Parsimonious Eurolung risk model a good predictor for all populations? An external validation study.

Filipe Leite, Ana Margarida Silva, Gonçalo Paupério, Lúcio Lara Santos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filipe LeiteUniversity of Beira Interior - Health Sciences Faculty, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal. filipe.miguel.leite@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-0407
Ana Margarida SilvaThoracic Surgery Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4448-9915
Gonçalo PaupérioThoracic Surgery Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-3934
Lúcio Lara SantosExperimental Pathology and Therapeutics Group, Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-5655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver 20 models have been developed in the last 30 years to predict postoperative mortality after thoracic surgery. The Parsimonious Eurolung score, introduced by Brunelli et al. in 2019, is a simplified logistic regression model for predicting perioperative morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) based on the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) database. While validated for European populations, no studies have confirmed its applicability in other populations with different backgrounds.

objectivesTo externally validate the Parsimonious Eurolung risk models using a Portuguese cohort of patients undergoing lung cancer resection.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent resection surgery at a Portuguese centre between January 2018 and December 2021. The Parsimonious Eurolung 1 (morbidity) and Parsimonious Eurolung 2 (mortality) models were used to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality. Model validation assessed calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

resultsA total of 410 patients were included. 4 (1.25%) patients died within 30 days. Mortality did not differ between types of surgery. 78 patients experienced significant morbidity, with pneumonectomies associated with highest morbidity rates. The mean Parsimonious Eurolung 1 score (morbidity) was 13.49% (SD 6.84) and the mean Parsimonious Eurolung 2 score (mortality) was 2.17% (SD 2.13). Morbidity scores differed significantly across years (p = 0.011) and were significantly higher in patients with complications (p < 0.001). For Parsimonious Eurolung 1, an AUC of 0.668 was calculated, with the calibration plot showing an underestimation for mid-range values and significant overfitting. For Parsimonious Eurolung 2, an AUC of 0.437 was obtained, showing gross underestimation of values.

conclusionsExternal validation was partially achieved. The Parsimonious Eurolung 1 score is moderately applicable for morbidity. The Parsimonious Eurolung 2 score is not validated for 30-day mortality in this cohort. It should not guide surgical eligibility, and this point can be generalized to other low-mortality settings. This study provides valuable insights into the performance of the Parsimonious Eurolung models in a specific national context while highlighting the ongoing challenges in risk prediction for thoracic surgery. The findings suggest a need for quality multicentric databases and more granular, population-specific risk models, potentially incorporating machine learning approaches.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsEurolung 1Eurolung 2Lung resectionModel validationParsimonious EurolungRisk model

Identifiers

PMID41350738
PMCPMC12797751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.