ReviewWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) diagnosis of rib fractures.
Review in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative ultrasonography in surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A single-center retrospective analysis of its utility in surgical planning and post-discharge follow-up.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Directed acoustic shadow enhancement for pre-incision ultrasound localization and precise incision planning in multiple rib fractures undergoing SSRF: a retrospective comparative feasibility study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo review the literature on the role of Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing rib fractures compared with other diagnostic modalities and to give recommendations on its role.
methodsBroad text PubMed database search was performed using general terms (rib, fracture, ultrasound, diagnosis) in English language without time restriction. Selected articles were critically read by three acute care physicians who have more than 20 years' experience in POCUS.
resultsUltrasound, as shown by a recent meta-analysis, had a pooled sensitivity of 89.3%, a pooled specificity of 98.4%, and a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 55.7 without difference between emergency and radiology departments. The uncertainty of evidence was high due to (1) selection bias, (2) geographical bias, and (3) heterogeneity of the operator's experience. POCUS has certain advantages including: (1) it is dynamic so it can evaluate the rib displacement during respiration, (2) It is portable so that it can be used in prehospital setting and disaster situations, (3) it has no risk of radiation so that it can be used in pregnant women, children, and in repeated follow-up, and (4) it has good resolution to evaluate the soft tissues around fractures. In contrast, its limitations include: (1) it is operator dependant, (2) it takes a longer time, (3) it cannot diagnose ribs covered by bones like those under the scapula, and (4) it needs a conscious patient to guide the examination. Ultrasound-guided blocks, including intercostal nerve block, serratus anterior plane block, and erector spinae plane block were successful in controlling the pain of multiple rib fractures.
conclusionsThis review supports the use of POCUS in diagnosing rib fractures, which can be extended into ultrasound-guided blocks for pain control. Nevertheless, it highlights the need for research with higher quality in this area. Ultrasound and CT scan should be complementary and not competitive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.