ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Polystyrene nanoplastics disrupt epididymal initial segment by perturbing NK cell differentiation and epithelial homeostasis.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The potential protective roles of Astragalus polysaccharides against toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics on mice sperm exposed.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spermatozoa exit the testis in an immotile and immature state, and obtain motility and maturity in the epididymis with the most abundant functions acquired in its initial segment (IS). The reshaping of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) exposure on the epididymis, however, has never been studied in detail yet, let alone from a multi-omic perspective. Herein, we utilized single-cell transcriptomics, untargeted metabolomics and in vivo experiments to explore PS-NPs-induced cellular remodeling of rat IS. A dose-dependent decrease in the epithelial thickness was merely observed in the IS (Control vs. low vs. medium vs. high group, 38.33 ± 2.52 vs. 32.67 ± 3.15 vs. 21.67 ± 3.58 vs. 11.08 ± 1.67 μm, respectively; P < 0.001) instead of the other three epididymal segments. PS-NPs exposure inhibited the acidification of epididymal luminal fluid (Control vs. low vs. medium vs. high group, pH, 6.05 ± 0.19 vs. 6.35 ± 0.14 vs. 6.57 ± 0.23 vs. 6.70 ± 0.24, respectively; P < 0.001), downregulated sperm acrosome reaction (Control vs. low vs. medium vs. high group, 42.67 ± 4.62% vs. 36.38 ± 4.04% vs. 28.07 ± 3.46% vs. 17.69 ± 2.52%, respectively; P < 0.05), and reduced sperm motility (Control vs. low vs. medium vs. high group, 83.08 ± 4.02% vs. 76.33 ± 2.08% vs. 70.67 ± 3.79% vs. 65.33 ± 2.89%, respectively; P < 0.01). Cell apoptosis after exposure existed across the IS without cell type-specificity. Besides, we found altered metabolic landscape and dysregulatory amino acid metabolites after exposure. Interestingly, cell-cell communication together with pseudotime trajectory delineated that PS-NPs facilitated NK cell differentiation towards cytotoxic and proliferative subtypes, during which ICAM and TNF signalings were upregulated. Moreover, PS-NPs exposure upregulated AQP9 through activating ERK1/2 in principal cells. Furthermore, we observed dysfunctions and ultrastructural defects of blood-epididymal barrier with downregulated protein levels of tight junction (VIM, SOX9, KRT5 and β-catenin) and upregulated ROS levels in basal cells. In summary, we offer previously unidentified insights into the contribution of PS-NPs in epididymal IS and extend on existing knowledge of environmental contaminant-induced epididymis damage that merits future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.