Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350712›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

The plasma nanoDSF denaturation profiles predict the presence of breast cancer.

Mathilde Guerin, Rémi Eyraud, Philipp O Tsvetkov, Pascal Finetti, Alexandre Giraudo, Carole Tarpin, Aymen Hassin, Didier Bechlian, Emilie Mamessier, Jihane Pakradouni and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01521676 (Research of Predictive Clinical and Biological Parameters in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01521676 naterminatednot on this map

Research of Predictive Clinical and Biological Parameters in Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Paoli-CalmettesRan2010 to 2026Enrolled749ConditionsBreast CancerArmsmolecular alteration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mathilde Guerin *Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Rémi Eyraud *Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, CNRS, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, Laboratoire Hubert Curien, UMR 5516, Saint-Etienne, France.
Philipp O Tsvetkov *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-8836
Pascal FinettiPredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Label " Ligue Contre le Cancer ", 232, bd de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, 13009, France.
Alexandre GiraudoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Carole TarpinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Aymen HassinAix Marseille Univ, CNRS INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.
Didier BechlianBiobank, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Emilie MamessierPredictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Label " Ligue Contre le Cancer ", 232, bd de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, 13009, France.
Jihane PakradouniDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Jean-Marie BoherDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Anthony GoncalvesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
François Devred *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-8898
François Bertucci *Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0157-0959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is a major problem of public health in western countries. The long-term survival improved thanks to therapeutic progresses and mass screening. Mass screening is based on mammography but displays limitations. Efforts are ongoing to develop accurate and minimally invasive tools for early BC detection. Analysis of liquid biopsies is a promising option, among which the ones based on thermal denaturation profiling provide a "thermodynamic signature" of disease through analysis of plasma protein denaturation profiles. We recently developed a major technical breakthrough of differential scanning calorimetry by switching to nanoDSF (Differential Scanning Fluorimetry), more easily transferrable in clinical routine. Here, we applied it for the first time to samples form BC patients.

methodsWe retrospectively applied nanoDSF to plasma samples from 176 patients collected in two prospective clinical trials and 61 healthy controls (HC). The profiles were analyzed using four artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Our primary objective was to test the potential of this approach to distinguish BC versus HC samples. We also assessed its ability to distinguish early versus advanced BC, and major molecular subtypes of disease.

resultsThe four algorithms provided predictive models displaying very good performances for distinguishing patients from HC. For example, the random forest-based model displayed 96.6% accuracy in properly classifying subjects, 99.4% sensitivity, and 88.5% specificity. These performances were not dependent on the clinicopathological characteristics of BC, and compared favorably to those of mammography-based screening. For comparison, the performances of predictive models centered on the secondary objectives (early versus metastatic stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus HR-negative status, and HER2-positive versus HER2-negative status) were good, but inferior, likely because of the stronger unbalance in the number of patients in each group and of more subtle differences in thermograms between patients' groups than between patients and HC.

conclusionsWe reveal the potential of nanoDSF and AI applied to plasma samples to discriminate between BC patients and HC. If these results are confirmed, such approach could represent a minimally-invasive, low risk, quick and low-cost technique, which could help to improve the screening of BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCalorimetry, Differential ScanningNanotechnologyProtein DenaturationAdultAgedAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceBiomarkerBreast cancerDifferential scanning fluorimetrynanoDSFPlasmaScreening

Identifiers

PMID41350712
PMCPMC12903520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.