ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
The plasma nanoDSF denaturation profiles predict the presence of breast cancer.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01521676 (Research of Predictive Clinical and Biological Parameters in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research of Predictive Clinical and Biological Parameters in Breast Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast nanoDSF Tear Fluid Profiling: Toward Diagnosis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is a major problem of public health in western countries. The long-term survival improved thanks to therapeutic progresses and mass screening. Mass screening is based on mammography but displays limitations. Efforts are ongoing to develop accurate and minimally invasive tools for early BC detection. Analysis of liquid biopsies is a promising option, among which the ones based on thermal denaturation profiling provide a "thermodynamic signature" of disease through analysis of plasma protein denaturation profiles. We recently developed a major technical breakthrough of differential scanning calorimetry by switching to nanoDSF (Differential Scanning Fluorimetry), more easily transferrable in clinical routine. Here, we applied it for the first time to samples form BC patients.
methodsWe retrospectively applied nanoDSF to plasma samples from 176 patients collected in two prospective clinical trials and 61 healthy controls (HC). The profiles were analyzed using four artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Our primary objective was to test the potential of this approach to distinguish BC versus HC samples. We also assessed its ability to distinguish early versus advanced BC, and major molecular subtypes of disease.
resultsThe four algorithms provided predictive models displaying very good performances for distinguishing patients from HC. For example, the random forest-based model displayed 96.6% accuracy in properly classifying subjects, 99.4% sensitivity, and 88.5% specificity. These performances were not dependent on the clinicopathological characteristics of BC, and compared favorably to those of mammography-based screening. For comparison, the performances of predictive models centered on the secondary objectives (early versus metastatic stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus HR-negative status, and HER2-positive versus HER2-negative status) were good, but inferior, likely because of the stronger unbalance in the number of patients in each group and of more subtle differences in thermograms between patients' groups than between patients and HC.
conclusionsWe reveal the potential of nanoDSF and AI applied to plasma samples to discriminate between BC patients and HC. If these results are confirmed, such approach could represent a minimally-invasive, low risk, quick and low-cost technique, which could help to improve the screening of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.