ArticleBMC oral health2025
Mechanical mechanism study of upper airway collapse and twin block treatment in a patient with mandibular retrognathia using fluid-structure interaction simulation.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT and finite element analysis of mandibular advancement device mechanics in a participant with obstructive sleep apnea: a proof-of-concept study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effects of Andresen Activator on Pharyngeal Airway Volume in Growing Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: CBCT Evaluation.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical mechanism of upper airway collapse and orthodontic treatment in a child with mandibular retrognathia.
methodsFluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation was used to evaluate the collapse mechanism of upper airway and orthodontic mechanism of Twin Block (TB) in a patient with mandibular retrognathia. The upper airway model was 3D printed by lithography technology, and the FSI boundary conditions of airway soft tissue collapse and biomechanical parameters of oropharynx were obtained by in vitro experiments.
resultsThe results showed that the maximum negative pressure of oropharynx before treatment was located in the posterior wall, and the pressure gradient was larger than that of other parts. After treatment, the maximum negative pressure was limited to a small area of the anterior oropharynx wall, which decreased from − 2741.81 Pa to -1767.54 Pa, and the pressure gradient also decreased significantly. And the maximum deformation was reduced from 3.44 mm to less than 1 mm, which was reduced by more than 70%. Pearson correlation test showed that the change rate of the cross section area (α) was positively correlated with pressure drop (P < 0.05), and the closer to 1 the α value reached, the smaller the oropharynx pressure drop was. The larger the aspect ratio was, the smaller the maximum negative pressure was (P < 0.05).
conclusionsThe collapse site of the upper airway in the presented child with mandibular retrognathia was not necessarily consistent with the narrowest part of the upper airway, and the cross-section shape and minimum pressure of the airway played a crucial role in affecting the collapse of the upper airway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.